Tag: Closed as Resolved ~ Loki

The following comment made by flying coaster is a clear violation of rule 2 and does not qualify under section 3 or related subsections for acceptability: 2.No racist, bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, pedophilic, incestuous or bestiality comments/memes.: Bud Light Sponsors Pride Event With Naked People and Other Concerning Things Near Children That this has been allowed to stand…

I really want to abide by rules here, and I very much appreciate being on a well moderated comment board. Not tp be troublesome, but could I get some clarification? “Nader shits his pants at press conferences, Schiff looks like a bug eyed lunatic, and Durham has serious BTK vibes.” http://disq.us/p/2usbqka Is a comment like…

Good morning,   I think my 24 hours was up yesterday.  Requesting release of ban.

Ban was for three days and was supposed to be lifted on Wednesday.  Do we have to ask to come back?

Please take down the beating gif.  I asked nicely and it’s still up, and now the video shows the beating without clicking it.

To help manage expectations, when a CM flags a comment that violates the guidelines approximately how long should the CM expect a mod to take action? I flagged a couple comments (multiple times) a day ago but am still waiting.

Ok, I served my time , so why did Sully put me in the box specifically? And why is it so hard to find the Den now ?

I wish to express a heart felt Thank You to the Mods and Staff for going the extra distance in passing OPs on articles of mine that did not have an image to use. Yup. LoL. That includes you too Sully. ;-p Don’t think I didn’t notice. Thank You, Shaky

I posted a SINGLE off topic, Rawr deleted it and wrote: MOD COMMENT: Irrelevant to the topic. Please post responsibly. Delete ALL off topics or none. But this selective enforcement of an unwritten rule is annoying. This isn’t the fittest time this has occurred.

Can some one explain to me how the context between my two comments changed with the insertion “gustave le bon.” Also why does a common phychology theory need to be directly referenced to meet site rules? Furteemore the “homophobic” rationale used makes little since when the comment is clearly focused on transgenderism. I would post…