Author: Lℇ✞✞u☪ℇ ⳨r∃Y

Could not help to notice that  an OP that contains some phrasing that appears to be contrary to the rules of engagement and as such should be viewed to be in violation of the authoring guidelines. The OP is here: https://breakingnewsandreligion.online/2025/02/21/the-so-called-party-of-joy-now-advocating-violence-in-the-streets-as-trump-derangement-syndrome-escalates-to-defcon-5/ Here are the sentences from the OP, with the points of concern underlined and…

Mod Obey just called me a child predator. He didn’t use my name directly but it’s obvious who he is referring to Is this within the rules? It’s from this article Trump signs executive order ending use of taxpayer money to ‘incentivize or support’ illegal immigration Thanks Obey 2 minutes ago Left wing child predators…

WTF? I and, other CMs. have been lectured to and have also had my OPs (re-)scheduled by MODs while creating 4 OPs to be displayed on the BNR landing page. Explaining to me it’s within a MOD’s discretion to do so. Right now, @disqus_phRVHF4xQ0:disqus has 7, SEVEN, OPs up on the BNR landing page. To MODs…

I put up an OP of a political cartoon today that a moderator immediately marked as “Closed, non compliant ~ AA”. The moderator also made a comment that says “Cartoon are MOD only post”. Link to the closed post is: https://breakingnewsandreligion.online/2025/02/19/political-cartoon-of-one-mind/ I find this curious in that I can see political cartoons have been posted…