What’s the problem with these comments? You guys explicitly told me I could call people illiterate and ignorant and degenerates because they’re not personal attacks. Heck, in the first comment below I didn’t even claim Rawr was the cheap ignorant degenerate who wouldn’t shell out cash to save a friend’s life. If you all assumed I was referring to Rawr that says more about your view of him than it does about me. But, in any case, those terms were okay-ed. I’d like the comments restored – particularly the first that doesn’t even directly mention Rawr – and I’d also like clarification on why it’s ok for Rawr to call a person illiterate and a liar, but mentioning the undeniable fact that his anti-Americanism is borne out of his ignorance or the opinion that his behavior indicates he’s a degenerate is not OK?
1) We Americans have far more moral fiber than a cheap ignorant degenerate who is too cheap and hypocritical to spend a few bucks to save his friend’s life.
2) How would an illiterate degenerate like you even understand the comment?
3) Don’t be more of an ignorant degenerate than you already are. Maybe your friend is in a tough place because you’re too cheap to help him and you just want Americans you hate to pick up the bill for his fuck boy lifestyle, but these policies will save lives.