There must have been something in my previous entry that came off the wrong way. As such, I apologize for the tone. I do however feel that more and more there is a bias being placed on any Den post that is uncalled for.
I am not posting something here to insult anyone. I am posting something on here to resolve something. In this case, Obey, who yes is a moderator but is also a CM, in his capacity as a CM, seriously insulted me by claiming I had no morals and had common cause with terrorists. This is not the first time he, as a CM, has done things like this; you can see a Den post from just a day ago showing a similar thing.
In response, I presented the same accusation, minus the terrorism support accusations, and was promptly banned for it.
The resolution I am requesting is twofold:
- an attempt to understand why his comment directly insulting me and accusing me of something heinous is considered ok while mine is not.
- an attempt to have the issue of (the perception of) lopsided moderation taken seriously.
Closing it, accusing me of insulting rather than trying to get the above resolution, and extending my ban isn’t IMO in keeping with the point of this channel. If so, you discourage anyone from using it as a resolution channel, since it would only lead to more punishment being dealt out and a presumption of bad intent.
Please, give this a chance. It is, again, not filed with ill intent. I am an active member of this community and do have a vested interest in the quality of engagement here. I’m not here to pester you. I simply do not want to be attacked by a person who seems above any accountability and then immediately banned for responding in lighter kind.