Could not help to notice that an OP that contains some phrasing that appears to be contrary to the rules of engagement and as such should be viewed to be in violation of the authoring guidelines.
The OP is here:
https://breakingnewsandreligion.online/2025/02/21/the-so-called-party-of-joy-now-advocating-violence-in-the-streets-as-trump-derangement-syndrome-escalates-to-defcon-5/
Here are the sentences from the OP, with the points of concern underlined and in bold:
In actuality, “take it to the streets” usually means cross-dressing in high heels, clown makeup and a rainbow-colored wig and prancing around Washington DC mall with a sign that displays some words of Libtard-fueled anger about the end of DEI, CRT, grooming in schools, and the Drag Queen Story Hour.
Now, some patriots are taking to social media to voice their opinions about these “Party of Joy” Libtards talking violent smack.
Democrats and Liberals who worship Satan and groom children to become transexual misfits with mutilated genitals are telling the straight, law-abiding Conservatives that we are “weird,” and some patriots simply aren’t having it.
Is an OP article containing this type of phrasing permissible?
Or is the faith and trust placed in the senior mod and Den centurion’s “discretion” who posted it simply strong enough to throw the rules of engagement into the trash and permit such a trashy article to stand for discussion?