To @Kpanteh:disqus
I must post this every week, it seems, but the rules that you’ve very clearly established in this forum regarding accusations of pedophilia against public figures seems to me to never be enforced, and then I am told I am not reading it correctly.
So PLEASE, can you clarify this loop right here?
<i>”No racist, bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, pedophilic, or incestuous comments/memes.
Examples of words that are not allowed: homo, tranny, fag, n-words, cracker, etc.”</i>
<i>”What IS allowed with caveats:
Insulting a politician, public figure or any other subject of an article is allowed <b>so long as it does not violate Rule #2.</b>
i.e. the President, an actor, the CEO of a company, just some dude in the article
comments regarding pedophilia, incest, etc may be allowed if the subject has been convicted of or is facing such accusations.”</i>
I’ve asked this over and over and over, but what the heck am I missing in this very simple statement? An accusation of pedophilia against a politician without any conviction or accusation is <b>NOT ALLOWED.</b>
Here is the comment I noted violated this:
“Who is Steve Schmidt? Is he one of those pedo Trump haters?”
http://disq.us/p/2qeayo5