DOWG is, again, posting from a site that doesn’t have a masthead or identify authorship of the article in question. A standard I continue to emphasize is very reasonable for “is this an article?”
And if you want to get a feeling for “does this violate our RBHTMPIS+ standards?” (it does) you can look at the nature of Disqus flies that replied to the article itself. Because, what Revolver appears to be is a version of our community, where people post things, and other people write back.
Who owns revolver.news? What do they believe?
This is an anonymous blog. It is not an article. It’s making a bigoted argument. It’s not at all clear what sources it’s citing to make its argument. It should be taken down. It is not clear who owns the blog.
- Anonymous blogs that do not cite verifiable article sources and/or do not list who owns the blog will no longer be permitted.