So here we are again with me repeating the Same question:
With recent advent of VPN and at home identity protection services, how does BNR expect to continue using its present disciplinary procedures of timeouts or bans?
Lets recap:
- Your Community guidelines are not fully understood by either the posters or the Mods. While this leads to the Mods having numerous grey areas where bias and “varying” actions can be applied, this is NOT providing either understanding nor equity to your Contributing Members (CMs)
- Despite significant changes/upgrades to Disqus and at home security, your Community Guidelines have not been updated or altered fo a few years.
- Your Channel owner is for all intensive purposes, ABSENT. One only has to look at his Disqus profile to see that while he spends a lot of time at one channel, it isn’t BNR. What perspective does THAT give to your CM’s?
Your guidelines and your entire means of control over the channel and discipline is no longer viable. Your channel owner freely admits this by continuously saying that the channel os full of socks.
I will continue to prove this to you as much as I can. To that end please know that I am still actively on BNR. While all of you are great at seeing the glaringly obvious profiles, you cannot ban a person ever. Only profiles.
So, your guidelines are crap, your control methodologies have become redundant, and your Channel Owner is absent.
What are you going to do about it?