Hello,
Sir Tainely has decided to put me in a time out for pointing out that laughing about murder victims is sick, and pointing out that a commentator is only here to stir up shit. he kindly requested I come here to discuss it.
This is of course completely disregarding Grun’s comment which directly insulted me, rather than my comment which discussed how fucked up his comment was.
http://disq.us/p/2bk16jq
Now I’m not sure how my comment is considered over the line, since I am told a version of this by several far right moderators almost daily, as well as direct insults on my intelligence. So when you ask me to acknowledge that personal attacks aren’t ok, I’m not sure what you are talking about. Seems to me that they are, so long as they are from Grun or Al or Agri or anyone on the right towards me.
So I think it may help me to understand if you can explain to me why calling me a cretin is fine, but calling out someone posting violent celebrations of a murder victim is not. Because at this point, all I can come up with is that some moderators’ commenting behavior is completely unaccountable, and new rules to protect their feelings regarding their posts pop up all the time.
I acknowledge I make some personal attacks. Calling someone’s fucked up post fucked up is not one of them. Calling me a cretin is.